{"id":65815,"date":"1992-03-04T14:25:00","date_gmt":"1992-03-04T11:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/?p=65815"},"modified":"2023-03-08T16:58:18","modified_gmt":"2023-03-08T13:58:18","slug":"park-otel-dugumu-danistay-cozecek","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/park-otel-dugumu-danistay-cozecek\/","title":{"rendered":"Park Otel: D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fc Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u00e7\u00f6zecek"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi otel in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davada g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verdi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ayaspa\u015fa \u00c7evre G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin Park Otel in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 istemiyle sekiz ay \u00f6nce \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vererek topu Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a att\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ayaspa\u015fa \u00c7evre G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin vekil avukat\u0131 Dervi\u015f Parlak, ayn\u0131 mahkemenin ge\u00e7en ay otel sahipleri taraf\u0131ndan in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fchr\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6k\u00fclmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma istemini yerinde buldu\u011funu, kendilerinin ba\u015fvurusunu ise Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a sevk etmesini ele\u015ftirdi. Parlak, &#8220;Karar, adaletin gecikmesine ve Park Otel denen ucube yap\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fckselmesine neden olacak&#8221; dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 son karar, Park Otel in\u015faat\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen hukuk sava\u015f\u0131n\u0131 iyice k\u0131z\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131. Mahkemenin &#8220;Olayda Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;nca tesis edilen ve d\u00fczenleyici mahiyette bulunan imar plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi i\u015fleminin iptali i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan dava 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu&#8217;nun 24. maddesi uyar\u0131nca Idare Mahkemesi de\u011fil. Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;\u0131n g\u00f6revli ve yetkili oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n mahkememizce incelenmesine olanak g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8221; yolundaki karar\u0131ndan sonra Park Otel sorunu i\u00e7in g\u00f6zler Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;\u0131n verece\u011fi karara \u00e7evrildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mahkemenin 7 \u015eubat 1992 tarihinde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar d\u00fcn taraflar\u0131n eline ula\u015ft\u0131. \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin verdi\u011fi g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle denildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu&#8217;nun 24. maddesinde ilk derece mahkeme olarak Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;da g\u00f6r\u00fclecek davalar say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ayn\u0131 maddenin 1. fikras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendinde Bakanl\u0131klar\u0131n d\u00fczenleyici i\u015flemleri ile kamu kurulu\u015flar\u0131 veya kamu kurumu niteli\u011finde meslek kurulu\u015flar\u0131nca \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ve \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131nda uygulanacak d\u00fczenleyici i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalarda bu davalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda yer alm\u0131\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davan\u0131n 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 15. maddesinin 1\/a bendi uyar\u0131nca g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6revli yarg\u0131 yeri olan Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a g\u00f6nderilmesine 7.2.1992 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Davac\u0131 vekil avukat\u0131 Dervi\u015f Parlak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Yasas\u0131&#8217;nda ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara ili\u015fkin davalara, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu mahkemenin bakaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti. Dervi\u015f Parlak, plan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ve yap\u0131 ruhsatlar\u0131 i\u015flemlerinin as\u0131l sahibinin Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil, daval\u0131 belediyeler oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekerek \u015funlar\u0131 dedi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Bu durumda dosyan\u0131n Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a g\u00f6nderilmesi hem adaletin gecikmesine hem de Park Otel denen ucube yap\u0131n\u0131n in\u015faat\u0131na devam edilmekle giderilmesi g\u00fc\u00e7 kamu zararlar\u0131n\u0131n artmas\u0131na ve b\u00f6ylece \u0130stanbul siluetine. \u0130stanbul halk\u0131na ve kent hukukumuza yap\u0131lan sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131na neden olaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Park Otel&#8217;in hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 fiili durumu, hukuk devleti ilkesini zedelemekte ve ne yaz\u0131k ki \u00e7arenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yolundaki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelere hizmet etmektedir.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Yeni proje<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Avan projesi \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi&#8217;nce iptal edilen Park Otel i\u00e7in haz\u0131rlanmakta olan yeni plan yak\u0131nda tamamlanacak ve in\u015faat\u0131n son durumu bu plana g\u00f6re belirlenecek.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin \u015fubat ay\u0131nda Park Otel m\u00fchr\u00fcn\u00fc iptal etmesi karar\u0131ndan sonra ba\u015flayan in\u015faat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u0131z\u0131yla s\u00fcr\u00fcyor. Semt sakinleri 24 saat aral\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, durumu, Beyo\u011flu Belediyesi&#8217;ne bildirmelerine kar\u015f\u0131n belediyenin gereken \u00f6nlemi almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyorlar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/AMWts8AuWep9t1AncgAbEjIii_YFt_TUgV5ATQarALjIw-LIUehsaFo7_QeYYywpn2z96gFkTi5HuYd9oEstua1H-h6VZB5MmR34DNULuuE_7SP30mzLFBPecXtokn87wBAq-F56qlKMLgwF4fgWzdcu6HTCEA=w1354-h433-no?authuser=1\" alt=\"\" title=\"\"><figcaption><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">4 Mart 1992 Sayfa 3<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi otel in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davada g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verdi Ayaspa\u015fa \u00c7evre G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin Park Otel in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 istemiyle sekiz ay \u00f6nce \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vererek topu Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a att\u0131. Ayaspa\u015fa \u00c7evre G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi&#8217;nin vekil avukat\u0131 Dervi\u015f Parlak, ayn\u0131 mahkemenin ge\u00e7en ay otel sahipleri taraf\u0131ndan in\u015faat\u0131n m\u00fchr\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6k\u00fclmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma istemini yerinde buldu\u011funu, kendilerinin ba\u015fvurusunu ise Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a sevk etmesini ele\u015ftirdi. Parlak, &#8220;Karar, adaletin gecikmesine ve Park Otel denen ucube yap\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fckselmesine neden olacak&#8221; dedi. \u0130stanbul 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 son karar, Park Otel in\u015faat\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":65103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1319],"tags":[1323],"class_list":["post-65815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-remzi-gokdag-cumhuriyet-haber-arsivi-1992","tag-1323"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65815\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}