{"id":65748,"date":"1992-10-09T13:54:00","date_gmt":"1992-10-09T10:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/?p=65748"},"modified":"2023-03-08T15:03:41","modified_gmt":"2023-03-08T12:03:41","slug":"beton-canavarlardan-kurtulus-yok","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/beton-canavarlardan-kurtulus-yok\/","title":{"rendered":"Beton canavarlardan kurtulu\u015f yok"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul Dolmabah\u00e7e’de ‘G\u00f6kkafes’ olarak an\u0131lan S\u00fczer Turizm A.\u015e’ye ait merkezde yeniden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015fland\u0131. 1983’te onaylanan ilk proje 400 odal\u0131, 24.5 metre y\u00fcksekli\u011finde bir otel i\u00e7indi. Ancak 1987’de Bedrettin Dalan’\u0131n belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neminde kabul edilen plan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle binaya 134 metreye kadar izin verilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

G\u00f6kkafes ya da S\u00fczer Oteli olarak tan\u0131nan Dolmabah\u00e7e Turizm ve \u0130\u015f Merkezi’nde \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir aradan sonra \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015fland\u0131. \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi’nin in\u015faat\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm hukuki giri\u015fimlerin S\u00fczer Holding lehine sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan in\u015faat\u0131n 134 metrelik projesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130n\u015faat\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l \u00f6nce \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi’nce m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesinden sonra Nurettin S\u00f6zen hakk\u0131nda TCK’n\u0131n 240. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bir ile \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi’nce Dan\u0131\u015ftay 2. Dairesi’ne yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru reddedildi. Dan\u0131\u015ftay, s\u00f6zkonusu yerde i\u015flem yapma yetkisinin B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi. Ceza davas\u0131 ile ilgili karar \u0130stanbul 5. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin bilirki\u015fi raporunu incelemesinden sonra verilecek.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130n\u015faat\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan giri\u015fimlere bug\u00fcnlerde bir yenisi daha eklendi. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fckkent \u015eubesi’nin giri\u015fimleriyle Ba\u015fbakan S\u00fcleyman Demirel ve ilgili bakanl\u0131klara birer yaz\u0131 g\u00f6nderildi. Yaz\u0131da, “\u0130stanbul’un bu kentsel cinayetten kurtulabilmesi i\u00e7in yeni bir Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu turizm merkezi karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesini sizden bekliyor ve bunu umut ediyoruz” denildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

‘Dur denilmeli’<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Ba\u015fbakan S\u00fcleyman Demirel’le birlikte Devlet Bakan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fbakan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Erdal \u0130n\u00f6n\u00fc, Devlet Bakan\u0131 Erman \u015eahin, Turizm Bakan\u0131 Abd\u00fclkadir Ate\u015f, Bay\u0131nd\u0131rl\u0131k ve Iskan Bakan\u0131 Onur Kumbarac\u0131ba\u015f\u0131. \u00c7evre Bakan\u0131 Do\u011fancan Aky\u00fcrek, K\u00fclt\u00fcr Bakan\u0131 Fikri Sa\u011flar ve Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k Ba\u015fdan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 G\u00fcne\u015f G\u00fcrseler’e de g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131da \u015f\u00f6yle denildi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“B\u00f6ylesi bir alanda ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 imar hakk\u0131 tan\u0131narak turizm ad\u0131na \u0130stanbul’un kimli\u011fini yok etmek, \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f uygarl\u0131k ve turizm anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131yla t\u00fcm\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

13.8.1984 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131nlanan Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131 ile turizm merkezi ilan edilen S\u00fczer’in G\u00f6kkafes adl\u0131 binas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmak istendi\u011fi alan\u0131n yeni bir Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131yla turizm merkezi olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131, b\u00f6ylece yak\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u0130stanbul’a y\u00f6nelik i\u015flenen kentsel su\u00e7lardan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli birine h\u00fck\u00fcmetinizce dur denilmesini arz ediyoruz.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Devlet Bakan\u0131 Erman \u015eahin s\u00f6z konusu yaz\u0131n\u0131n bakanl\u0131\u011fa ve ilgili bakanl\u0131klara ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bakanl\u0131kta konuyla ilgili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. \u015eahin, “Mimarlar Odas\u0131’n\u0131n bu yaz\u0131s\u0131 ilgili bakanl\u0131klara g\u00f6nderildi. Bu yaz\u0131 bana da iletildi. S\u00f6z konusu yerdeki turizm merkezi karan\u0131 ancak Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131yla kald\u0131r\u0131labilir. Konuyla ilgi ne gibi i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilece\u011fini tart\u0131\u015f\u0131yoruz” dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

26 Mart 1989 yerel se\u00e7imlerinin hemen ard\u0131ndan Nurettin S\u00f6zen taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fch\u00fcrlenen in\u015faatla ilgili olarak taraflar aras\u0131nda ba\u015flayan hukuk sava\u015f\u0131 da s\u00fcr\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130n\u015faat\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla belediyenin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalarda ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n S\u00f6zen aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalarda bug\u00fcne dek belediyenin lehine bir karar \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hukuki geli\u015fmeler<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Konuyla ilgili hukuki geli\u015f meler \u015f\u00f6yle:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nurettin S\u00f6zen i\u015fba\u015f\u0131na geldikten iki ay sonra “\u0130stanbul\u2019un ba\u011fr\u0131na saplanm\u0131\u015f han\u00e7er” dedi\u011fi “G\u00f6kkafes’ in\u015faat\u0131n\u0131 17.5.1989 tarihinde “in\u015faat\u0131n yandaki parsellere tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle m\u00fch\u00fcrledi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\u00fch\u00fcrleme i\u015fleminden sonra Dolmabah\u00e7e Turizm ve \u0130\u015f Merkezi taraf\u0131ndan S\u00f6zen aleyhine \u0130stanbul 4. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nde dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. Mahkeme belediye i\u015fleminin iptaline karar verdi ve karar 177.1990 tarihinde taraflara tebli\u011f edildi. Bunun \u00fczerine in\u015faat\u0131n plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirildi ve in\u015faat tekrar belediye taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fch\u00fcrlendi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ancak S\u00fczer tekrar dava a\u00e7t\u0131 ve kazand\u0131. Bu kez mahkeme, belediyenin b\u00f6yle bir plan de\u011fi\u015ftirmeye yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, s\u00f6z konusu parselin turizm merkezi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funa karar verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Belediye bu karar \u00fczerine temyize giderek Dan\u0131\u015ftay’a y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 istemiyle ba\u015fvurdu. Dan\u0131\u015ftay 2. Dairesi y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 isteminin reddine ve in\u015faat\u0131n devam\u0131na karar verdi. Karar 18.3.1992 tarihinde taraflar\u0131n eline ula\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00fct\u00fcn bu geli\u015fmeler s\u00fcrerken in\u015faat\u0131 yapan m\u00fcteahhit firma STFA ile S\u00fczer Holding aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan anla\u015fmazl\u0131k nedeniyle in\u015faata bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc ba\u015flanamad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bunun \u00fczerine m\u00fcteahhit firma de\u011fi\u015ftirildi ve i\u015f INTES A.\u015e’ye verilerek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden yeniden ba\u015fland\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

9 Ekim 1992 Sayfa 3<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0130stanbul Dolmabah\u00e7e’de ‘G\u00f6kkafes’ olarak an\u0131lan S\u00fczer Turizm A.\u015e’ye ait merkezde yeniden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015fland\u0131. 1983’te onaylanan ilk proje 400 odal\u0131, 24.5 metre y\u00fcksekli\u011finde bir otel i\u00e7indi. Ancak 1987’de Bedrettin Dalan’\u0131n belediye ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neminde kabul edilen plan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle binaya 134 metreye kadar izin verilmi\u015fti. G\u00f6kkafes ya da S\u00fczer Oteli olarak tan\u0131nan Dolmabah\u00e7e Turizm ve \u0130\u015f Merkezi’nde \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir aradan sonra \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015fland\u0131. \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi’nin in\u015faat\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm hukuki giri\u015fimlerin S\u00fczer Holding lehine sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan in\u015faat\u0131n 134 metrelik projesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi. \u0130n\u015faat\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l \u00f6nce \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi’nce m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesinden sonra Nurettin S\u00f6zen hakk\u0131nda TCK’n\u0131n 240. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bir ile<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":65103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1319],"tags":[1323],"class_list":["post-65748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-remzi-gokdag-cumhuriyet-haber-arsivi-1992","tag-1323"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65748\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}