{"id":65592,"date":"1993-10-19T13:52:00","date_gmt":"1993-10-19T10:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/?p=65592"},"modified":"2025-03-26T16:40:57","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T13:40:57","slug":"gokkafesin-sahibinin-actigi-dava-reddedildi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/gokkafesin-sahibinin-actigi-dava-reddedildi\/","title":{"rendered":"G\u00f6kkafes’in sahibinin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava reddedildi"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beton canavar “G\u00f6kkafes”in sahibi Mustafa S\u00fczer’in Mimarlar Odas\u0131 ile Cumhuriyet gazetesi aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 2 milyar liral\u0131k tazminat davas\u0131nda mahkeme, ret” karar\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131nda, do\u011fal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel zenginli\u011fini tehdit eden Dolmabah\u00e7e’deki “G\u00f6kkafes” in\u015faat\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Mimarlar Odas\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kampanyan\u0131n “kamu yarar\u0131na” oldu\u011fu ve odan\u0131n yasal g\u00f6revleri” i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ayn\u0131 kararda, s\u00f6z konusu in\u015faata kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen kampanyay\u0131 kamuoyuna duyuran Cumhuriyet gazetesinin de anayasa ve yasalardan kaynak y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fi, G\u00f6kkafes’e y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirileri i\u00e7eren haberlerin di\u011fer yay\u0131n organlar\u0131nda da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, nitekim bu kampanya ve yay\u0131nlara ko\u015fut olarak yetkili mercilerce binan\u0131n y\u00fcksekli\u011finin sekiz kata indirildi\u011fi ve t\u00fcm bu eylemlerin “mesleki ve yasal g\u00f6rev olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtidi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u015eubesi, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 “\u00e7\u0131karc\u0131 kesimlerin, kente ve \u00e7evreye sahip \u00e7\u0131kanlar\u0131n \u00fczerinde kurmak istedikleri bask\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 hukuksal g\u00fcvencenin anlaml\u0131 bir belgesi” olarak niteledi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dolmabah\u00e7e Turizm A\u015e, “beton canavar, kentsel cinayet, y\u00fckseklik korkusu” gibi haberlerle kendilerini a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve aleyhte kamuoyu yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle gazetemize ve “ticari itibarlar\u0131n\u0131 karalamaya y\u00f6nelik” tebli\u011f ve yay\u0131nlar yapt\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131yla da Mimarlar Odas\u0131’na kar\u015f\u0131, 2 milyar liral\u0131k maddi ve manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u015eubesi ile gazetemizin imtiyaz sahibi Berin Nadi, Yaz\u0131 i\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc F\u00fcsun \u00d6zbilgen ve haberleri yapan muhabir Remzi G\u00f6kda\u011f aleyhinde a\u00e7\u0131lan 2 milyar liral\u0131k tazminat davas\u0131 mahkemece reddedildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, in\u015faat\u0131 ba\u015flatan \u015firketin 1 milyar lira maddi, I milyar lira da manevi tazminat talebini \u015fu gerek\u00e7elerle reddetti:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“S\u00f6z konusu in\u015faat, \u0130stanbul G\u00fcm\u00fc\u015fsuyu’nda \u0130T\u00dc ile \u0130n\u00f6n\u00fc Stadyumu aras\u0131nda sade daval\u0131 gazete (Cumhuriyet) de\u011fil, di\u011fer bas\u0131n organlar\u0131nda da yay\u0131mlanan t\u00fcm \u0130stanbullular\u0131n bildi\u011fi ve kamuyu ilgilendiren y\u00fcksek irtifal\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131, \u00e7evreyi, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcy\u00fc bozaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda yayg\u0131n s\u00f6ylenti olan bir in\u015faatt\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye’nin tarihi, co\u011frafi, turistik \u00f6neme haiz do\u011fal ve fiziksel g\u00fczellikleri kapsayan ve d\u00fcnyada da b\u00fcy\u00fck ve g\u00fczel \u015fehirlerin ilk s\u0131ralar\u0131nda gelen \u0130stanbul’un do\u011fal ve fiziki yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn daha fazla bozulmamas\u0131, ye\u015fil alanlar\u0131n azalmamas\u0131, yeterince s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 yaratan altyap\u0131 hizmetlerinin daha da k\u00f6t\u00fcye gitmemesi gayesi ile daval\u0131 Mimarlar Odas\u0131’n\u0131n bu bina nedeni ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma bas\u0131na ve ilgili resmi mercilere ba\u015fvuru ve beyanatlar\u0131 yasadan kaynaklanan hakk\u0131n, kamu yarar\u0131 nedeni ile icras\u0131nda ibaret g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp kas\u0131t ve haks\u0131z fiil unsuru g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden, ayr\u0131ca daval\u0131lar\u0131n sahip ve mensubu olduklar\u0131 gazetedeki ne\u015friyat\u0131nda anayasa ve yasalardan kaynaklanan g\u00fcncel ve kamuyu yak\u0131ndan ilgilendiren bir haber mahiyetinde olup manevi tazminat\u0131n yasal unsurlar\u0131ndan hi\u00e7biri ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi gibi, davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen ifadelerinden ba\u015fka maddi zarar olu\u015ftu\u011fu ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bir an i\u00e7in bu ne\u015friyat nedeni ile in\u015faat\u0131n yava\u015flamas\u0131 ya da durmas\u0131 hatta y\u00fcksekli\u011finin resmi mercilerce azalt\u0131lmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, bu eylemlerin kasten davac\u0131ya zarar vermek gayesi ile de\u011fil, mesleki ve yasal g\u00f6rev icab\u0131 kamu yarar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda dava yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“\u00d6zel Turizm B\u00f6lgesi” ilan edilmesinden sonra, \u0130n\u00f6n\u00fc Stadyumu’nun hemen yan\u0131nda yap\u0131m\u0131na ba\u015flanan G\u00f6kkafes, Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’ndan 44 kat i\u00e7in izin alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak daha sonra \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Meclisi, yap\u0131n\u0131n \u0130stanbul’a verece\u011fi zararlan g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne alarak imar plan\u0131nda kat s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 8 kata indirince, Turizm ve Bay\u0131nd\u0131rl\u0131k bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da in\u015faat\u0131 sekiz katla s\u0131n\u0131rlad\u0131. Bunun \u00fczerine in\u015faata ba\u015flayan Dolmabah\u00e7e Turizm \u015firketi, gazetemiz ve Mimarlar Odas\u0131 aleyhine s\u00f6z konusu davay\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

19 Ekim 1993 Sayfa 3<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davan\u0131n reddinden sonra Oktay Ekinci’nin 31 Ekim 1993 tarihinde Pazar Eki’nde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"31ekim1993suzerdavas\u0131\"
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Beton canavar “G\u00f6kkafes”in sahibi Mustafa S\u00fczer’in Mimarlar Odas\u0131 ile Cumhuriyet gazetesi aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 2 milyar liral\u0131k tazminat davas\u0131nda mahkeme, ret” karar\u0131 verdi. \u0130stanbul 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131nda, do\u011fal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel zenginli\u011fini tehdit eden Dolmabah\u00e7e’deki “G\u00f6kkafes” in\u015faat\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Mimarlar Odas\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kampanyan\u0131n “kamu yarar\u0131na” oldu\u011fu ve odan\u0131n yasal g\u00f6revleri” i\u00e7erisinde bulundu\u011fu vurguland\u0131. Ayn\u0131 kararda, s\u00f6z konusu in\u015faata kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen kampanyay\u0131 kamuoyuna duyuran Cumhuriyet gazetesinin de anayasa ve yasalardan kaynak y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirdi\u011fi, G\u00f6kkafes’e y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirileri i\u00e7eren haberlerin di\u011fer yay\u0131n organlar\u0131nda da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, nitekim bu kampanya ve yay\u0131nlara ko\u015fut olarak yetkili mercilerce binan\u0131n y\u00fcksekli\u011finin sekiz kata indirildi\u011fi ve t\u00fcm bu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":65103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1320],"tags":[1322,1306,1307],"class_list":["post-65592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-remzi-gokdag-cumhuriyet-haber-arsivi-1993","tag-1322","tag-gokkafes","tag-suzer-plaza"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65592"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65592\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.remgo.com\/11\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}